Compare

Lanten vsMissive

Missive is one of the best shared inboxes there is: email, WhatsApp, SMS and live chat in one place, with team chat around every thread. Lanten is a shared inbox too — but it’s built for one kind of team. It knows which property a message is about, syncs with your CRM, and does the work after the reply. This page is our honest attempt at the difference.

Try Lanten free Book a demo

The short version

Both are shared inboxes. One of them knows what a tenancy is.

Choose Missive if…

You need SMS, live chat, Instagram and Messenger alongside email, you like building your own rules and workflows, and your team isn’t in property. It’s a superb general-purpose tool and we’d say so to anyone.

Choose Lanten if…

You run or work in an estate or letting agency. You want the inbox to know the property, the landlord and the tenant without you tagging anything, to write the reply in your voice, and to log the job in Street or Acquaint when you approve it.

Side by side

Based on Missive’s published features and pricing as of September 2026. If we’ve got something wrong, tell us and we’ll fix it.

LantenMissive
Built forUK estate & letting agents onlyAny team that shares an inbox
Shared team inboxYes — lettings@, sales@, WhatsApp, in one viewYes — its core strength
EmailOutlook & GmailGmail, Outlook, IMAP
WhatsAppBuilt in, on the Meta Business PlatformVia WhatsApp Business API, extra setup
SMS, live chat, Instagram, MessengerNoYes
Knows which property a message is aboutYes — matched to the CRM recordNo — it doesn’t know what a property is
Property CRM syncStreet & Acquaint, two-way; more comingNone — Zapier/API if you build it
AI draftsIn your voice, with the property and tenancy contextGeneric AI assist (bring your own OpenAI key)
Plan for the whole jobReply, log, task, chase — proposed and run on approvalReply only
TasksCreated from the message, assigned, trackedAssignments and internal chat on the thread
TagsProperty-aware, applied automaticallyManual labels + rules you write
Rules & automationsProperty-specific, no setupDeep, but you build every rule
Team chat inside threadsNotes and mentionsYes — full internal chat
Data hostingUKNot published
Price£27 / user / month (£20 annual)From $14 to $36 / user / month
Free trial7 days, no cardFree plan up to 3 users

Lanten is the best Missive alternative for estate & letting agents

Same shared-inbox foundations. Then the part Missive can’t do.

The shared inbox, without the setup

Shared mailboxes, WhatsApp, assignments and tags from day one. No rules to write — it already knows what an agency’s inbox looks like.

Every message tied to a property

Missive sees a thread. Lanten sees the thread, the property, the landlord, the tenancy and the last three maintenance jobs — pulled from your CRM, not typed in.

The work after the reply

Log the job, raise the task, chase the contractor, update the record. Lanten proposes the plan and runs it when you approve. Missive stops when you hit send.

Where it actually matters

Three things a general shared inbox can’t do for an agency, however good the collaboration is.

It doesn’t know what a property is

In Missive, “14 Elm Road” is a string of text. In Lanten it’s the record — with the landlord, the tenant, the tenancy dates and the boiler that was fixed in March. That’s the difference between a tidy inbox and one that can actually help.

You’d be building the agency workflow yourself

Missive gives you rules, labels, canned responses and an API. Getting from there to “maintenance requests go to property management, tagged by property, with a job logged in Street” is a project. Lanten ships with that already done.

The CRM is still a separate tab

Every reply in Missive still means opening Street or Acquaint, finding the record and logging what happened. Lanten reads the record before it drafts and writes back to it when you approve. Two-way, in the same screen.

Already on Missive? Run both for a week.

Connect the same shared mailbox to Lanten and watch what it does with the property context. Free for 7 days, no card.